Reason as the Leading Motive

Relationships and Fidelity

Posted by Jerry on July 15, 2006

Over at The Objectivist Center website, William Thomas recently answered the question: What is the Objectivist view on infidelity/cheating in a relationship, be it either dating or marriage?

Reading his answer to the question, I feel like I’m re-reading one of my own posts on the topic! Thomas and I have come so close in our responses that it appears as if we even use the same words in the same way! For example:

Thomas says:

The commitment to a relationship is…worth no more than the relationship itself. As value-oriented ethic, Objectivism as such is neither for or against exclusivity in relationships; it does not prescribe a form of dating; it does not favor or oppose marriage as an institution. It favors serious commitment to one’s values, and honesty toward oneself and toward others in one’s relationships.


Monogamy is not intrinsically moral as such. The morality of a relationship – regardless of their design – is an attribute of the integrity of the individuals involved in that relationship. Thus, two people involved in a monogamous relationship are not necessarily involved in a de facto “moral” relationship – nor would three people involved in a relationship be in a de facto “immoral” or lascivious relationship.

Thomas says:

Love is premised on knowledge: what the lover does not know, he cannot love.

I said:

The very idea of being in “love” with someone presumes that you know what loving someone means. Thus, inorder to say to someone, “I love you”, and be honest about it, you have to keep salient in your mind all the processes of thought and choices and values that brought you up to that point of saying, “I love you.”

Thomas says:

Objectivism holds that honesty is one of the major virtues. In the end, one gains nothing by dishonesty; it leaves one trapped in a web of fakery, which makes reality one’s enemy and reason a threat to be feared in anybody one knows. [I]n relationships Objectivism holds that one should be honest, especially with a lover. “Cheating,” as it is normally thought of, involves hiding what one is doing or sneaking about. Objectivist principles imply that if one is (or is going to be) involved with someone besides one’s committed partner, one should be honest with all parties concerned.

I said:

Personal integrity should be the hallmark of one’s character. Integrity subsumes honesty, and honesty means never faking reality. In relationships, as in other areas of life, there is no room for wilfull, deliberate and/or pernicious deceit. This connects with honesty, in that if there is any form of uncertainty, it should be brought out into the open. Any instance of wilful repression of doubt or faking of certainty is an instance of being deceitful and is compromising on your integrity.

2 Responses to “Relationships and Fidelity”

  1. John Enright said

    The coincidence is almost spooky.

  2. Ergo said

    Upon revisiting this post, I realized how someone might construe this post as me making a claim that my thoughts had been plagiarized in some fashion.

    So, to make it clear, NO. This is not the intention of this post. When I wrote it up, I merely wanted to highlight the *similarities* of William Thomas’ views with those of mine on this topic. Further, I wanted to point out–using this topic as an example–how a proper and integrated understanding of Objectivism leads people to a common and shared understanding of the truth and of reality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: