Reason as the Leading Motive

Abolish Limbo

Posted by Jerry on December 1, 2005

Limbo — the place where the Catholic Church teaches that babies go if they die before being baptized — may have its days numbered.

How convenient. Oh, and while we’re at it, might as well abolish hell… and purgatory too… why not? Being the pope in the Catholic Church is so cool — he gets to create his own reality for “souls” of dead people… upon his wishes there was a limbo… and now upon the wishes of the new pope… there might not be one anymore. I feel sad for the souls who will be evicted from the limbo — where will they go? Oh, the tortured state of such homeless souls, even in death they can’t find rest.

Pope John Paul asked the commission to come up with “a more coherent and enlightened way” of describing the fate of such innocents.

So, according to whatever new description they come up with for the fate of these “innocent” souls, there will indeed exist such a place that will fit the description that they attempt to create. That’s quite amazing powers that the pope has!

(Interestingly, if the Church is already assuming that these souls are innocent, then why aren’t they in heaven by default? Doesn’t innocent mean in some manner, pure, sinless, holy, naive? Is it not enough that one is devoid of sin to be in heaven? Does the soul REQUIRE to have done “good deeds” while alive in order to be admitted to heaven? I thought God was all-loving and all-merciful. It’s strange that God has such reservations on letting the souls of babies into heaven. Apparently, His love and mercy does not extend to the souls of babies who have not “wilfully” chosen HIM — because they simply, physiologically cannot do that yet. However, God’s ego — being so bloated that it is — requires even from babies that stringent criteria that they must have chosen God and good deeds inorder to be admitted to heaven — if not, they have to go to this place called “limbo” — which, incidentally, might not exist anymore if the pope decides so.
Oh, all the CRAP people believe!!)


16 Responses to “Abolish Limbo”

  1. You think the Catholic Church has a grip on people’s minds? Look at the news story and read through the wordplay. They paint it as a game. You have internet at your fingertips. Search Vatican archives, something, anything. But come on now, the Catholic Church isn’t stupid. It’s only the basis for all Christian religion. Only been around for 2000 years. Use your noggin, not your emotional response to some negative Yahoo! news.

  2. Ergo Sum said

    *only* been around for 2000 years!?!? Damn, it’s the oldest church around today!
    It’s the basis for *all* christian religions?? On what grounds? I bet a gazillion non-catholic christians will disagree with you.

    I ain’t saying the Catholic Church is stupid at all! Infact, if you read through some of my blogposts you will realize that I understand the Catholic church is very intellectual… as a collective entity. Infact, it’s intellectual rationalizations are almost insidiously smart/evil.

    That is not to say that Protestants are any less pernicious. I’m an atheist. My default position is that faith in any mysticism is ignorance at best, dangerously evil at worst.

  3. Semperviva said

    just FYI limbo is not a catholic teaching- its a theorization of some Catholic theologians…

  4. Semperviva said

    Augustine thought unbaptized children went to Hell. This idea is ultimetely rejected by the Church because they have NO personal sin, no guilt and can therefore NOT be damned.

  5. Ergo Sum said

    No personal sin, no guilt, and therefore cannot be damned. But apparently, they’re not good enough to get to heaven either, cuz the Pope feels that he needs to come up with a new description for their eventual fate… the assumption being, a new description is required because they do not go to heaven like other good souls, hence the “heaven” description of state does not apply to these “innocent souls”

    Also, limbo HAS to be Catholic doctrine because the very INSTITUTION of Catholicism, i.e. the Pope and the rest of the Vatican guys are struggling to deal with their doctrine… change it in some way.

    If you define “Catholic doctrine” in some other way that precludes atleast in some instances the authority of the legitimate Catholic body, i.e. the Vatican and the Pope, then you are obviously being heretical, and you have no business calling those opinions “Catholic”.
    Official Catholicism is exactly what the Official Church and the Pope says it is.

  6. “Only” was sarcastic…hehe.

    Of course Protestant churches will say they aren’t from Catholics. But no matter, that is the case of things. The entirety of Protestant faith is from Catholicism. Every single thing they believe is either taken directly from Catholic doctrine or is a deviation from it.

    Christianity is Catholicism and then everything else that springs out. Nooo, that’s not me being ostentatious or anything. My father is a theologian with 6 degrees so I hear quite a bit about this and the rationlization for it. Nooo, I’m not bragging about my father. But he does offer me a wealth of information.

    Yeah, I didn’t really go through all your blog posts. When I’ve got the time maybe ;-).

    I must ask you as an atheist: what is evil if their is no God? Evil is an opposite of good morality. You cannot have morality without a God. So what is evil then? I’m very interested as to hwo atheists would approach that.

    I’ll hunker down to the rest of your blog soon enough…


  7. Ergo Sum said

    Oh. Here we go again. How can an atheist have morals without a god. Hmmm… I’ll just post a few links to my other blogposts that tackle that issue… it’ll make it easier for you and me.

  8. Tyrel said

    Ha! It is an endless battle for you!

    To all of you out there, I have only one thing to say to you –


    (I decided to jump on that bandwagon too!)

  9. Ergo Sum said

    The Bandwagon is our favorite kind of wagon… so it seems! 🙂

    Btw, Vdhiubn has a great blog out there that y’all should check out. I agree with everything he says there.


  10. Oh, Ergo, such shameless self-promotion. Even inveterate band-wagoneers can see through such shams.



  11. Ergo Sum said

    Oh whatever… you’re such a knntt.


  12. Ergo Sum said

    I swear that was really my word verification! How appropriately timely, don’t you think?!

    Very zvrwv. It’s uncanny.–>

  13. […] in a limbo, with absolutely no possibility of having a union of God. Indeed, this blog made a note of this issue in December 2005 when the previous pope raised this matter for his Church to […]

  14. Alfredo said

    I need to to thank you for this excellent read!

    ! I certainly enjoyed every little bit of it.
    I’ve got you saved as a favorite to look at new things you post…

  15. Awesome post.

  16. Milla said

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as
    though you relied on the video to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw
    away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: